Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research Articles

Uncoupling interferons and the interferon signature explains clinical and transcriptional subsets in SLE.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) displays a hallmark interferon (IFN) signature. Yet, clinical trials targeting type I IFN (IFN-I) have shown variable efficacy, and blocking IFN-II failed to treat SLE. Here, we show that IFN type levels in SLE vary significantly across clinical and transcriptional endotypes. Whereas skin involvement correlated with IFN-I alone, systemic features like nephritis associated with co-elevation of IFN-I, IFN-II, and IFN-III, indicating additive IFN effects in severe SLE. Notably, while high IFN-II/-III levels without IFN-I had a limited effect on disease activity, IFN-II was linked to IFN-I-independent transcriptional profiles (e.g., OXPHOS and CD8+GZMH+ cells), and IFN-III enhanced IFN-induced gene expression when co-elevated with IFN-I. Moreover, dysregulated IFNs do not explain the IFN signature in 64% of patients or clinical manifestations including cytopenia, serositis, and anti-phospholipid syndrome, implying IFN-independent endotypes in SLE. This study sheds light on mechanisms underlying SLE heterogeneity and the variable response to IFN-targeted therapies in clinical trials.

Lack of awareness of systemic lupus erythematosus and its consequences in a cohort of moderate and severe patients in Spain: The LupusVoice study.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition that can highly impact patients' quality of life (QoL). However, there is a lack of knowledge about SLE, affecting the general population and health care professionals (HCPs) alike. This lack of knowledge has negative implications for patients and the healthcare system, worsening prognosis, negatively impacting QoL, and increasing healthcare utilization. The aim of this paper is to draw attention, according to the perspective of the participants of this study, to the lack of awareness of SLE and its consequences in Spain, and to suggest improvements. This qualitative, descriptive, observational, multicenter, and cross-sectional study included 40 patients with moderate or severe SLE, recruited during their routine visits in six university hospitals in Spain. The study also included 11 caregivers and 9 HCPs. All participants were individually interviewed. Data from the interviews were coded and analyzed thematically by two anthropologists following a phenomenological perspective. Our study identified a lack of disease awareness among primary care physicians, emergency medicine doctors, and other specialists treating SLE symptomatology. This led to diagnostic delays, which had a clinical and emotional impact on patients. Furthermore, symptom awareness was found to be context dependent. Differences in symptom awareness between HCPs and patients led to a mismatch between the severity evaluation made by doctors and patients. Some HCPs did not consider the limitations of the current severity evaluation of SLE, and therefore attributed symptoms potentially caused by SLE to the unfavorable socioeconomic conditions patients lived in. Finally, a lack of social awareness among friends, family members, and romantic partners led to lower social support, increased isolation, and negative physical and emotional impact for patients. Gender differences in the provision of support were identified. This study highlights the need to increase SLE awareness among patients, HCPs, and the broader public in order to improve patient QoL. Being aware of the clinical and emotional impact of such lack of awareness, as well as the role played by context on the patient experience of SLE, is a crucial step towards achieving this goal.

Type I interferon blockade with anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus modulates key immunopathological pathways in a gene expression and proteomic analysis of two phase 3 trials

IntroductionAnifrolumab is a type I interferon (IFN) receptor 1 (IFNAR1) blocking antibody approved for treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we investigated the immunomodulatory mechanisms of anifrolumab using...

Clinical and economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia

Aims Our cost-of-illness (COI) model adopted payer and societal perspectives over five years to measure the economic burden of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Colombia. Materials and methods A prevalence-based model was constructed to estimate costs and economic consequences for SLE patients in Colombia. The model included four health states: three phenotypes of SLE representing mild, moderate, and severe states and death. The clinical inputs were captured from the published literature and validated by the Delphi panel. Our model measured direct medical and indirect costs, including disease management, transient events, and indirect costs. One-way sensitivity analysis was also performed. Results The number of Colombian SLE patients was 37,498. The number of SLE patients with mild, moderate, and severe phenotypes was 5343, 28757 and 3,397, respectively. SLE-patients with moderate (Colombian pesos; COP 146 billion) and severe phenotypes (COP276 billion) incurred higher costs than those with mild phenotypes (COP2 billion), over 5 years. The total SLE cost in Colombia over five years from the payer and societal perspectives was estimated to be COP 915 billion and 8 trillion, respectively. The costs per patient per year from the payer and societal perspectives were COP 4,881,902 ($3,510) and COP 46,637,054 ($33,528), respectively. Conclusion The burden of SLE in Colombia over five years is substantially high, mainly due to the consequences of economic loss because it affects women and men of working age, in addition to the costs of SLE management and its consequences, such as flares, infection, and organ damage. Our COI indicated that disease management costs among patients with moderate and severe SLE were substantially higher than those among patients with a mild phenotype. Therefore, more attention should be paid to limiting the progression of SLE and the occurrence of flares, with the need for further economic evaluation of novel treatment strategies that help in disease control.

The economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in Taiwan

Background Our cost-of-illness (COI) model adopted both payer and societal perspectives over a time horizon of 5 years to measure the economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Taiwan. Methodology A prevalence-based model was established to estimate the economic consequences of SLE after diagnosis in Taiwan. The model included four health states: (i) the three phenotypes representing mild, moderate, and severe SLE, and (ii) death. The inputs were obtained from a literature review of all the clinical trials and validated using a Delphi panel. The Delphi panel’s insights included commonly used treatment strategies for patients with SLE within the Taiwanese healthcare system. The costs mentioned in this model are disease management, monitoring, transient event, and indirect costs. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the model uncertainty. Results The number of patients with SLE in our COI model was 20,189. At diagnosis, the number of SLE patients with mild, moderate, and severe phenotypes was 5,916, 12,255, and 2019, respectively. The total SLE cost in Taiwan over 5 years from both payer and societal perspectives was estimated at TWD 3.9 and 47 billion, respectively. The costs per patient per year from the payer and societal perspective were TWD 38,775 ($2,758) and TWD 466,119 ($33,152), respectively. Conclusion The findings demonstrated that the burden of SLE in Taiwan over a time horizon of 5 years is substantially high, mainly due to the consequences of economic loss as it affects women and men during their working age, in addition to the costs of SLE management and its consequences, such as flares, infection, and organ damage. Therefore, more attention should be paid to limiting the progression of SLE and the occurrence of flares, and further economic evaluations are necessary to assess novel treatment strategies that could control the disease.

Mezagitamab in systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and mechanistic findings of CD38 inhibition in an autoimmune disease

ObjectiveTo evaluate safety and mechanism of action of mezagitamab (TAK-079), an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsA phase 1b double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study...

CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Autoimmune Disease — A Case Series with Follow-up

BackgroundTreatment for autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), idiopathic inflammatory myositis, and systemic sclerosis often involves long-term immune suppression. Resetting aberrant autoimmunity in these diseases through deep depletion of B cells is a potential strategy for achieving sustained drug-free remission.MethodsWe evaluated 15 patients with severe SLE (8 patients), idiopathic inflammatory myositis (3 patients), or systemic sclerosis (4 patients) who received a single infusion of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells after preconditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Efficacy up to 2 years after CAR T-cell infusion was assessed by means of Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) remission criteria, American College of Rheumatology–European League against Rheumatism (ACR–EULAR) major clinical response, and the score on the European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group (EUSTAR) activity index (with higher scores indicating greater disease activity), among others. Safety variables, including cytokine release syndrome and infections, were recorded.ResultsThe median follow-up was 15 months (range, 4 to 29). The mean (±SD) duration of B-cell aplasia was 112±47 days. All the patients with SLE had DORIS remission, all the patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis had an ACR–EULAR major clinical response, and all the patients with systemic sclerosis had a decrease in the score on the EUSTAR activity index. Immunosuppressive therapy was completely stopped in all the patients. Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 10 patients. One patient each had grade 2 cytokine release syndrome, grade 1 immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and pneumonia that resulted in hospitalization.ConclusionsIn this case series, CD19 CAR T-cell transfer appeared to be feasible, safe, and efficacious in three different autoimmune diseases, providing rationale for further controlled clinical trials. (Funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and others.)

Add-on sirolimus for the treatment of mild or moderate systemic lupus erythematosus via T lymphocyte subsets balance

ObjectiveThe efficacy of sirolimus in treating severe or refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been confirmed by small-scale clinical trials. However, few studies focused on mild or moderate SLE. Therefore,...

Comparison of patients with isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus systemic lupus erythematosus with cutaneous lupus erythematosus as the sole clinical feature: A monocentric study of 149 patients

BackgroundCutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may present as an isolated entity or be classified as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the presence of laboratory abnormalities including cytopenia, low complement levels and/or autoantibodies (CLE with laboratory SLE). ObjectiveTo compare isolated CLE and CLE with laboratory SLE and to validate an existing 3-items score with age <25 years (1 point), phototypes V-VI (1 point), antinuclear antibodies ≥1:320 (5 points) to predict the risk of progression from CLE to severe SLE. MethodsMonocentric cohort study including consecutive CLE patients. CLE with laboratory SLE was defined by 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SLE score of ≥ 10 points at baseline with CLE as the sole clinical feature. ResultsOf the 149 CLE patients, 20 had CLE with laboratory SLE. Median follow-up duration was 11.3 years (IQR: 5.1-20.5). Ten patients (7%) developed severe SLE. In survival analysis, the risk of progression to severe SLE was higher among CLE with laboratory SLE (HR=6.69, [95%CI: 1.93-23.14], p<0.001) compared to isolated CLE. In both groups, none of the patient with a risk score ≤ 2 developed severe SLE. LimitationsMonocentric study with limited number of patients ConclusionCLE with laboratory SLE patients have higher risk of progression to severe SLE than isolated CLE.

Successful pregnancy after cyclophosphamide therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report

Introduction and importance: The use of cyclophosphamide in women of childbearing age with severe systemic lupus erythematosus is normally indicated. However, cyclophosphamide is generally avoided during pregnancy due to the risk of teratogenicity, especially since its effect on fetal survival is poorly understood. This is a case report of a lupus patient exposed to cyclophosphamide during pregnancy. Case presentation: A 35-year-old woman with a history of lupus presented to our outpatient clinic in the 12th week of pregnancy for her sixth routine cyclophosphamide bolus. The fetal echocardiogram result with the gynecology consultation was normal with the recommendation for a medical termination of pregnancy, which has been refused by the patient. Shared decision-making with the patient included a discussion of the maternal risks of continuation of pregnancy in the setting of worsening systemic function and the fetal risks of definitive treatment with cyclophosphamide for a lupus flare and the patient decided to proceed with the pregnancy. Treatment with immunosuppressants, including azathioprine was initiated replacing cyclophosphamide with close monitoring of her and the fetus every month. Clinical discussion: The first trimester of pregnancy seems to be particularly susceptible to fetal malformations, although CPA effects on fetuses in later stages of pregnancy are also reported occasionally. Nonetheless, its repercussions on fetal survival remain poorly comprehended. Conclusion: In conclusion, exposing pregnancy to cyclophosphamide could end with pregnancy loss. Based on our experience, the survival of the fetus is strongly in doubt when cyclophosphamide is required to treat lupus in the mother. However, in rare cases, it could be without complications.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: How Machine Learning Can Help Distinguish between Infections and Flares.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a multifaceted autoimmune ailment that impacts multiple bodily systems and manifests with varied clinical manifestations. Early detection is considered the most effective way to save patients' lives, but detecting severe SLE activity in its early stages is proving to be a formidable challenge. Consequently, this work advocates the use of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for the diagnosis of SLE flares in the context of infections. In the pursuit of this research, the Random Forest (RF) method has been employed due to its performance attributes. With RF, our objective is to uncover patterns within the patient data. Multiple ML techniques have been scrutinized within this investigation. The proposed system exhibited around a 7.49% enhancement in accuracy when compared to k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm. In contrast, the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Binary Linear Discriminant Analysis (BLDA), Decision Trees (DT) and Linear Regression (LR) methods demonstrated inferior performance, with respective values around 81%, 78%, 84% and 69%. It is noteworthy that the proposed method displayed a superior area under the curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy (both around 94%) in comparison to other ML approaches. These outcomes underscore the feasibility of crafting an automated diagnostic support method for SLE patients grounded in ML systems.

Cost-of-illness changes before and after the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide, population-based observational study in Korea

Abstract Objectives To estimate the direct healthcare cost progression from before to after systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis and to compare healthcare costs by disease severity. Methods Patients with incident SLE diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance database. Annual direct healthcare costs for 5 years before and after SLE were estimated and compared with those of age-, sex- and calendar month-matched (1:4) controls, without SLE. Direct healthcare costs were compared by disease severity of SLE using regression analysis. Results Among 11 173 patients with SLE and 45 500 subjects without SLE, annual direct healthcare costs per person increased in the year before SLE diagnosis and peaked in the first year after diagnosis. They were 7.7-fold greater in the SLE patients than in the subjects without SLE ($5871 vs $759). Severe SLE was associated with 3.284-fold (95% CI: 3.075, 3.507) higher annual costs than mild SLE during the year after diagnosis. Older age (age 60–79 years), lupus nephritis, interstitial lung diseases, and comorbidities such as avascular necrosis and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher annual direct healthcare costs (times [95% CI]) in the first year after diagnosis: age 60–69: 1.119 (1.034, 1.211); age 70–79: 1.470 (1.342, 1.611); lupus nephritis: 1.794 (1.711, 1.881); interstitial lung diseases: 1.435 (1.258, 1.638); avascular necrosis: 6.208 (4.541, 8.487); and chronic kidney disease: 1.858 (1.673, 2.064). Conclusion Patients with SLE incurred significantly higher direct healthcare costs than subjects without SLE during the first year after diagnosis. Disease severity, older age, major organ involvements and comorbidities were associated with increased healthcare costs.

CD19/BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy for Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Data from a Phase I Clinical Study

Background: Despite significant advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a subset of patients continue to experience severe progression of their disease despite multiple immunosuppressive and targeted therapies. Furthermore, to date, drug-free remission and seroconversion have been difficult to achieve in SLE. CD19 single-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown promising efficacy in SLE but have been unable to attack CD19-negative, long-lived plasma cells, which produce numerous antibodies.This trial aims to study the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of deep B-cell clearance in patients with refractory SLE using autologous anti-CD19 and BCMA CAR-T cells. Method: The CAR product was manufactured by Shanghai YaKe Biotechnology Ltd. The clinical study was conducted in a dose-escalation format. T cells were enriched from patient's peripheral blood, transfected with lentiviral vectors and expanded. After lymphodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (D-4 to D-2), patients receive a single infusion of 1-2x106 CD19 CAR-T cells and BCMA CAR-T cells per kilogram of body weight at D0. On the first day of chemotherapy initiation , all SLE-related immunosuppressants, biologics, etc. were discontinued except for a few patients who were maintained on low-dose prednisolone. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune-related effector cell neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and infections. Initial efficacy was assessed by attainment of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), dsDNA antibody and ANA seroconversion, and discontinuation of all SLE-specific therapies. Results: As of July 31, 2023, 12 patients with refractory SLE were treated with CD19/BCMA CAR-T cells with a median follow-up of 118.5 (45-524) days. All patients had active severe SLE and had received glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine, tacrolimus, total glucosides of paeony, merti-macrolide, leflunomide, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, immunoglobulin, rituximab, belimumab, and Tetracycline before treatment with CAR-T cells, which were standard treatments that were either ineffective or difficult to withdraw.3 patients received 1x10^6/kg of each of CD19 CAR-T cells and BCMA CAR-T cells, and 9 patients received 2x10^6/kg of each of CD19 CAR-T cells and BCMA CAR-T cells 2x10^6/kg. CAR-T cells were prepared successfully in all patients. BCMA CAR-T achieved expansion in all patients, while CD19 CAR-T did not expand in 1 patient, and expansion of CAR T cells preceded depletion of circulating B cells. All patients developed grade 1 CRS, which manifested as controllable fever, and no ICANS occurred. 11 patients (91.7%) developed grade 4 hematologic toxicity, and 1 patient (8.3%) developed grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Within 6 months of CAR-T treatment, 2 patients were infected with neocoronavirus, 1 patient developed gastrointestinal tract infection, and 1 patient developed pulmonary infection , and all of them recovered after treatment. The SLEDAI-2K score decreased in all patients, from a mean of 18.3 to 1.5. Low-level proteinuria persisted in some patients, possibly due to previously accumulated glomerular filtration impairment. All patients met LLDAS criteria and were able to successfully discontinue all SLE-related medications, including glucocorticoids. peripheral blood B cells recovered at approximately 3 months after CAR-T therapy. To date, no SLE flares have occurred. Conclusions: These data suggest that CD19/BCMA CAR-T cell therapy is well tolerated and can induce rapid and durable remission in severe refractory SLE.

Effect of SARS-CoV2 infection on disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-control study

Abstract Objectives To study the effect of SARS-CoV2 infection on flares of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Patients who fulfilled the ACR/SLICC criteria for SLE and had documented COVID-19 between February and November 2022 were identified retrospectively from our hospital COVID-19 registry. SLE controls who did not have SARS-CoV2 infection were randomly matched for age, sex and the time of infection in a 2:1 ratio with those infected. The primary outcome of interest was clinical flare of SLE within 90 days of COVID-19. The rate of SLE flares (mild/moderate or severe) was compared between SARS-CoV2-infected SLE patients and controls. Results 91 SLE patients with COVID-19 (age 48.6 ± 14.0 years; 95.6% women) and 182 SLE controls (age 48.7 ± 13.8 years; 95.6% women) were studied. Eleven of 91 (12.1%) SARS-CoV2-infected patients had serious manifestations. One (1.1%) patient died and 7(7.7%) developed severe complications. Within 90 days of SARS-CoV2 infection, 14(15.4%) patients developed mild/moderate clinical SLE flares and 2(2.2%) patients had severe SLE flares. The incidence of SLE flares in SARS-CoV2-infected patients was significantly higher than those without the infection (17.6% vs 5.5%; odds ratio 3.67[1.59–8.46]; p = 0.001). The changes in anti-dsDNA and complement levels, however, were not significantly different between the two groups. Among SARS-CoV2-infected SLE patients, those with clinical SLE flares had significantly lower C3 values (p = 0.004) before the infection than those without. Conclusion Clinical flares within 90 days were significantly more common in SLE patients infected with SARS-CoV2 than matched non-infected SLE controls.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in England prior to vaccination: a retrospective observational cohort study

ObjectivesDetermine the prevaccination healthcare impact of COVID-19 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in England.DesignRetrospective cohort study of adult patients with SLE from 1 May to 31 October 2020.SettingClinical...

Unusual Presentation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting any organ with diverse clinicalmanifestations. Lupus-related acute pancreatitis (AP) is a serious cause of SLE-induced acute abdominal discomfort, along with lupusmesenteric vasculitis. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a complex and chronic autoimmune disease characterized by its ability toaffect virtually any organ system, resulting in a wide array of clinical manifestations. One particularly severe complication associatedwith SLE is lupus-related acute pancreatitis (AP), which can cause acute abdominal discomfort. Lupus mesenteric vasculitis is anotherabdominal manifestation of SLE, further highlighting the systemic nature of the disease. Lupus pancreatitis is more common in femalesand the third decade of life, with an incidence ranging from 0.7% to 4%. This case report describes a 16-year-old Saudi female whopresented to the emergency department with episodic fever, epigastric abdominal pain, sweating, loss of appetite, and diarrhoea,among other symptoms. Her laboratory test results showed leukopenia, anaemia, increased liver, and pancreatic enzyme levels,increased inflammatory markers, and hypocomplementemia. She was diagnosed with lupus pancreatitis after ruling out other potentialcauses. Treatment included steroids and hydroxychloroquine. The patient showed marked improvement in resolving all symptoms,emphasizing the need for prompt diagnosis and management. This case insists on timely diagnosis and appropriate management inmitigating the potentially severe consequences of lupus pancreatitis and other SLE-related complications. In conclusion, SLE is amultifaceted autoimmune condition that affects various organs, including the pancreas, leading to conditions like lupus pancreatitis.The presented case serves as a poignant reminder of the diverse clinical presentations of SLE and highlights the crucial role of promptdiagnosis and effective management in improving patient outcomes.

Symposium 6

The ultimate goal of treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is to prolong survival without compromising the quality of life. The survival rates of SLE have plateaued since the 2000s’ and morbidities related to disease activity and treatment are still problematic. A big unmet need for SLE therapy is to develop strategies that can enhance efficacy, reduce disease flares and drug related complications. Cocktail immunosuppressive therapies for the synergistic effect of individual drugs may enhance efficacy and enable dosage reduction. However, risk of infective complications, adoption of a step-up or step-down approach and the choice of agents are still controversial, partly because of the issue of cost-effectiveness. Belimumab is the first biological agent licensed for pediatric and adult patients with renal and non-renal SLE, based on several pivotal randomized controlled trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-NEA, BLISS-SC, BLISS-LN). The continuous use of belimumab enables reduction of disease flares, glucocorticoid doses and organ damage. Anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody against type I interferon receptors, has shown efficacy for non-renal SLE in the TULIP studies. It is recently licensed for moderate to severe SLE patients who are receiving standard therapies. Although rituximab did not show benefit in renal and non-renal SLE, it is commonly used off-label to treat refractory lupus manifestations. The newer generation anti-CD20 biologic, obinutuzumab, shows promising preliminary results in a phase 2 lupus nephritis (LN) trial. Combination of anti-CD20 and anti-BAFF is being studied in LN but the results are conflicting hitherto. Ianalumab, a monoclonal antibody against BAFF receptor that exhibits dual mechanisms of action (BAFF inhibition and B cell depletion), is being studied in LN. The updated 2023 EULAR recommendations for SLE have included the role of biological agents in the treatment algorithm. Belimumab and anifrolumab may be considered in non-major organ SLE, including skin disease, that is refractory to hydroxychloroquine with or without other immunosuppressive agents. Initial combination therapy of glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil or low dose cyclophosphamide, with belimumab is an option for the treatment of severe LN, and belimumab may be used as long-term maintenance therapy of SLE/LN. In this talk, the evidence and the role of the older and newer biologic and targeted agents in SLE/LN will be reviewed.

Target Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Narrative Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against cells and involves many organ systems in the body. The Lupus Foundation of America estimates that around 1.5 million cases occur in America and at least 5 million cases occur worldwide. Every year it is estimated that there are around 16 thousand new cases of SLE. Various pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor (TGF), interleukin-10, B cell activating factor (BAFF), interferon-α, interleukin-17, and interleukin-23 play an important pathogenic role. Disruption of apoptotic cells and immune complexes is an important contributor to the development of this disease. Loss of immune tolerance increases antigenic load, excessive role of T cells, impaired B cell suppression and impaired transition of the immune response from T helper 1 (Th1) to Th2 which causes hyperactivity of B cells and produces pathogenic autoantibodies. The management of cases of severe or refractory SLE to conventional therapy has attracted a lot of attention in recent years, so that many researchers have developed several targeted therapies that have been tested on SLE, such as anti-CD 20 and CD 22 antibodies and BAFF inhibitors found in B lymphocyte cells. The Rituximab anti-CD 20 antibody target has been clinically proven to be able to improve the severity of SLE, while the effectiveness of other targeted therapies is still under research.

Machine learning: Predicting hospital length of stay in patients admitted for lupus flares.

Although rare, severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares requiring hospitalization account for most of the direct costs of SLE care. New machine learning (ML) methods may optimize lupus care by predicting which patients will have a prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). Our study uses a machine learning approach to predict the LOS in patients admitted for lupus flares and assesses which features prolong LOS. Our study sampled 5831 patients admitted for lupus flares from the National Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2018 and collected 90 demographics and comorbidity features. Four machine learning (ML) models were built (XGBoost, Linear Support Vector Machines, K Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression) to predict LOS, and their performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, including accuracy, receiver operator area under the curve (ROC-AUC), precision-recall area under the curve (PR- AUC), and F1-score. Using the highest-performing model (XGBoost), we assessed the feature importance of our input features using Shapley value explanations (SHAP) to rank their impact on LOS. Our XGB model performed the best with a ROC-AUC of 0.87, PR-AUC of 0.61, an F1 score of 0.56, and an accuracy of 95%. The features with the most significant impact on the model were "the need for a central line," "acute dialysis," and "acute renal failure." Other top features include those related to renal and infectious comorbidities. Our results were consistent with the established literature and showed promise in ML over traditional methods of predictive analyses, even with rare rheumatic events such as lupus flare hospitalizations.

Prevalence, patient characteristics and treatment patterns among SLE-PAH patients in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective analysis of Medical Data Vision Database in Japan.

Real-world evidence regarding prevalence, patient characteristics and treatment patterns for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Japan is limited. We conducted a retrospective study analysing Japan's Medical Data Vision (MDV) database from April-2008 to September-2020. Prevalence, incidence, patient characteristics, treatment patterns and use of vasodilators by treatment line were evaluated. Prevalence of PAH was 0.392% in SLE patients (n=114/29,077). Cumulative incidence was 0.53% (3-years (y)) and 0.77% (5y). Of 114 SLE-PAH patients, 49% developed PAH <1 year from SLE diagnosis. SLE-PAH patients were more female (88% vs. 72%), had lower mean age at SLE diagnosis (53y vs. 56y) and more severe SLE (61% vs 25%), versus non-PAH SLE patients. Glucocorticoids (58%) and vasodilators (27%) were preferred first-line monotherapy for SLE-PAH. Glucocorticoids+immunosuppressants (19%) was predominant first-line combination therapy. Endothelin receptor antagonists (40% and 44%) and nitric oxide analogues (31% and 40%) were dominant first- and second-line vasodilators. SLE-PAH patients were more females, younger at diagnosis, had more severe SLE than non-PAH SLE patients. Most were diagnosed <1 year of SLE diagnosis. In Japan's real-world practice, initial treatment goal is SLE management, while vasodilators are preferred in advanced disease, as per MDV database.